On a server I have a public key auth only for root account. Is there any point of logging in with a different account?

    • @Lemmchen@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      How did the attacker gain your user’s privileges? Malware-infected user installation? A vulnerability in genuine software running as your user? In most scenarios these things only become worse when running as root instead.

      • @ShortN0te@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        65 days ago

        The scenario OC stated is that if the attacker has access to the user on the server then the attacker would still need the sudo password in order to get root privileges, contrary to direct root login where the attack has direct access to root privileges.

        So, now i am looking into this scenario where the attack is on the server with the user privileges: the attacker now modifies for example the bashrc to alias sudo to extract the password once the user runs sudo.

        So the sudo password does not have any meaningful protection, other then maybe adding a time variable which is when the user accesses the server and runs sudo

          • @ShortN0te@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            15 days ago

            And what do you suggest to use otherwise to maintain a server? I am not aware of a solution that would help here? As an attacker you could easily alias any command or even start a modified shell that logs ever keystroke and simulates the default bash/zsh or whatever.

          • @JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            05 days ago

            Nah just set up PAM to use TOTP or a third party MFA service to send a push to your phone for sudo privs.

              • @JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                0
                edit-2
                5 days ago

                I…I don’t understand the question.

                Also, yubikey or any other token. Plenty of MFA options compatible with sudo.

              • @4am@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                -25 days ago

                Then you can’t gain root privileges on your server. Are you really arguing for less security because it’s inconvenient?

                This is end-user behavior and it’s honestly embarrassing. You should realize your security posture is much more important than “I left my phone on the other room”

                • @slothrop@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  45 days ago

                  This thread is embarrassing,
                  The person you’re responding to could wipe your ass with a cli.

                • @miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  25 days ago

                  ffs…am I dealing with children here?
                  You’ve accessed your server as a user, and then you su - to root.
                  You don’t need a phone or a yubi or a dreamcatcher, or a unicorn.
                  Please stop with your pretension.
                  You’re so far out of your league that it’s embarrassing to me that I’ve bothered to answer.

                  • @JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    1
                    edit-2
                    4 days ago

                    There must at least be MFA somewhere on the path then.

                    Even just keys, I wouldn’t trust, unless they are stored on smartcards or some other physical “something I have”, require a PIN/passphrase. and centrally managed so they can be revoked and rotated. Too many people use unprotected SSH keys.

      • SavvyWolf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        05 days ago

        I don’t think that actually works; the attacker could just remove .bashrc and create a new file with the same name.

          • SavvyWolf
            link
            fedilink
            English
            04 days ago

            The home directory would need to be immutable, not bashrc.

            • @2ndSkin@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              4
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              ?

              It’s .bashrc, not bashrc, and .bashrc is in the home directory.
              If .bashrc is immutable, it can’t be removed from home.

              • SavvyWolf
                link
                fedilink
                English
                14 days ago

                It’s the directory that needs to be writable to delete files, not the file itself.

                Although the immutable bit (if that’s what you’re talking about - I thought you meant unsetting the write bit) might change that, I’m not sure.

        • WheelchairArtist
          link
          fedilink
          15 days ago

          you’re right. that’s something i wanted to look into. guess setfacl would do the trick?